Talk:Time in Tolkien's fiction
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Chiswick Chap in topic Error about the Second Age with the Barrow Wights
 | Time in Tolkien's fiction has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 3, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Error about the Second Age with the Barrow Wights
editFirst for discussion here:
Miller sees Frodo's encounter with the Barrow-wight similarly, as another "exercise in temporal archaeology." Here, the time visited is the Second Age, at the moment when the Witch-King of Angmar (the leader of the Nazgûl) attacks from his fortress of Carn Dûm and defeats the people who lived around what became the Barrow-downs.
The thing is that while I don't doubt the main point which is that this is Time-Travel, it is somewhat less spectaculously from the Third Age to the Third Age. The time is clearly that of the fight of the Northern-Dunedain kingdoms against the Witch-King; and that was in the Third Age. So, change that? --138.245.1.1 (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever age it is argued to be, the point here is that we have a reliable literary source who said what is stated. If another RS states in a way that we can cite that Miller got it wrong, we can add that. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think we need a source to correct an obvious error.--138.245.1.1 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please read WP:V. I've fixed it, citing Appendix B. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think we need a source to correct an obvious error.--138.245.1.1 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever age it is argued to be, the point here is that we have a reliable literary source who said what is stated. If another RS states in a way that we can cite that Miller got it wrong, we can add that. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)