Talk:Time in Tolkien's fiction/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Artem.G (talk · contribs) 08:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey Chiswick Chap, I will be reviewing this article. The subject is thrilling, will be happy to assess it. Please expect comment in the next few days. Artem.G (talk) 08:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Turned out that you reworked almost all articles on Tolkien and Middle-earth; they are great, thanks a lot for it!
- Thank you for the kind words, and for taking on this review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
editFew comments/question:
- He built a process of Decline and fall in Middle-earth - Decline shouldn't be capitalized.
- Fixed.
- The cultural historian Modris Ekstein remarked that "rational man [had] undermined his own world" - Modris Eksteins should be a wikilink.
- Good find, done.
- and followed by the destruction of the two Lamps of Middle-earth and then - can you please point me to what are these two Lamps?
- Wikilinked.
- Earthly Paradise: Lothlórien has been compared to the place dreamed of in the Middle English poem Pearl.[25] Miniature from Cotton Nero A.x shows the Dreamer on the other side of the stream from the Pearl-maiden. - who (or what) is 'A.x'? And please put a period after 'Cotton Nero'.
- Fixed.
Thanks for quick response!
Few more comments:
- An Adventure by Charlotte Moberly and Eleanor Jourdain can be linked to Moberly–Jourdain incident
- Done.
- George du Maurier (friend of James's) - is it important that he was his friend?
- It's significant as it shows they were part of a network of writers leading to Dunne and then Tolkien. The network is cited to Flieger in the table and the text above it.
- Updated version of James's The Sense of the Past; it cites Einstein's Relativity and seems to allude to J. W. Dunne's dimensions of time - I doubt that Relativity should be capitalized, but if it's to distinguish 'The Relativity' of Einstein from any other theory of the same name, let it be.
- Fixed.
Apart from these minor comments, I think the article is really great - it's beautifully written, broad, cite good sources; images are nice and appropriate, and there is no copyright violations. I think it's indeed a GA, so once the latest suggestions would be addressed, I would pass it. Artem.G (talk) 09:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Artem.G - many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)