This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Length would not normally be a factor in GAs, but this article is too underdeveloped in my honest opinion. There are one or two sentence-long sections. Sections crucial for such articles, such as Toli Masjid#Interior, are not fleshed out enough. Much of the sources come from news sites. I would expect some more variety, especially since sources on this mosque do not appear to be hard to find. I believe this list of good articles on relevant topics could be a good reference for a future nomination. If the last two sections cannot be expanded enough, they would have to be merged with other sections, otherwise this goes against MOS:BODY, and more from the already used sources could be included in the article, specifically this. I suggest creating a Bibliography or Sources section, so that each page could be separately cited, instead of repeatedly using the same references which include ranges of pages. Aintabli (talk) 12:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
