Talk:Tom's Rhinoplasty
Tom's Rhinoplasty has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Tom's Rhinoplasty is part of the South Park (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhat is the name of the song that plays when Wendy is reflecting on losing Stan, and you see the flashbacks and projectile vomiting?
Trivia
editwhere be the trivia —Preceding unsigned comment added by KariaRockz (talk • contribs) 05:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editDoes this article pass the notability test? Alastairward (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
:No it doesnt. Merge per WP:V: "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found featuring significant coverage of a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Change opinion on this article - Tom's Rhinoplasty appears to have been subject of a number of scholarly reviews on LGBT studies, although I cannot access the pieces themselves. -- The Red Pen of Doom 05:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- See This page to discuss about the merger. --Gman124 talk 16:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- "Appears", but unless we know that these multiple studies do more than "passingly mention" the episode, we cannot know for sure. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 06:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- See This page to discuss about the merger. --Gman124 talk 16:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Tom's Rhinoplasty
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Tom's Rhinoplasty's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "EpGuide":
- From Damien (South Park): Stall, Sam (2009). The South Park Episode Guide: Volume 1, Seasons 1-5. New York City, New York: Running Press. p. 29. ISBN 0762435615.
- From Starvin' Marvin (South Park): Stall, Sam (2009). The South Park Episode Guide: Volume 1, Seasons 1-5. New York City, New York: Running Press. p. 25. ISBN 0762435615.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tom's Rhinoplasty/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Flash {talk} 01:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Yello! Saw this at GAN and I'd love to assist WP:SP on their FT project, so I'll be reviewing this article. Looks good but I do have a number of small concerns. Check out Talk:I Married Marge/GA1 for my structural system in reviews, and let's get started. The Flash {talk} 01:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Lead
edit- Can you come up with a better adjective then "insanely"?
- Extremely? — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- "'Tom's Rhinoplasty', the show's first Valentine's Day epiosde,[...]" -> typo
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Forgot to add a quotation marker after "Species."
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- "Wrapped" seems a bit slang-ish, am I wrong? Perhaps, "concluded"?
- Concluded it is. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Plot summary
edit- Who does Wendy suggest ideas to? Stan?
- Correct. Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wikilink to Kenny's page.
- Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- "Concurrently, a large group of women rampages the streets[...]" -> "[...]group of women rampage[...]"
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Combine the second and third sentences in the third paragraph, please.
- "She also thanks Mrs. Kimball (one of the women from the group of women that chased Garrison)[...]" -> "She also thanks one of the women from the group that chased Garrison named Mrs. Kimball"
- I'm a bit confused—by "figures out what actually happened" do you mean that Wendy framed Ms. Ellen and caused her death by Iraqis? If so, it needs to be clarified.
- Let me know if that is clearer. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Production
edit- It mentions Parker directed, too, but the infobox and the lead mention that the director was uncredited.
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- "[...]but Comedy Central censors made them change the line.[...]" -> "made Parker and Stone"
- Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Is that bit about the Postal controversy actually a "production" note?
- Moved to Reception. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- "[...]in the background that looks exactly Craig Tucker[...]" -> "looks exactly like Craig Tucker"
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think some of the bits about Wendy saying "fuck" for the first time and things like it should be moved in the "Cultural references" section, though that should be renamed "Cultural references and impact"
- Moved that bit and renamed the section. If you think other stuff should be moved to, let me know what. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- "The idea featured in the script of Ms. Ellen taking one of the children to dinner for passing[...]" -> awkwardly worded there, don't you think?
- I fixed it a bit. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe you should move their surprise about fan reaction to the "Reception" section?
- Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Theme
edit- There's no mention in the plot about Garrison being a model.
- I changed the Plot summary part a bit to address it. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing else here, but maybe you can expand it with some of the bits at "Cartman Gets an Anal Probe" and "Weight Gain 4000"?
- I added a bit. Is this what you meant? — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Cultural references
edit- You should rename the section to "Cultural references and impact"
- Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- The first paragraph should be broke up a bit.
- OK. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delink to Hasselholf (already linked above)
- Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- "When Ms. Ellen asks the class the last lesson[...]" -> "asks the class about the last lesson"
- Done. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Reception
edit- Rename "Reception and release" (?)
- "[...]in a three-DVD in November 1998." -> "in a three-disc DVD" perhaps?
- Changes to "three-disc DVD set". — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Images
edit- All 3 images are fine; the infobox image has a very weak rationale though, so can you beef it up at all? Just a passing mention of the animation process would even be suitable.
- Can you change the caption for the infobox image? It's rather....lackluster, ya know?
- I think the new caption addresses both these concerns. — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Final say
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- IMDb link in Ref 19 is throwing it all off; I'd suggest removing the link entirely.
- Done. — Hunter Kahn 01:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- IMDb link in Ref 19 is throwing it all off; I'd suggest removing the link entirely.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Needs those two things fixed, but other then that looking great. Fix those and I'll pass this. Cheers, The Flash {talk} 23:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- I've gone ahead and passed it. Great work, The Flash {talk} 01:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 02:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)