Talk:Tom Hawkins (footballer, born 1988)

"young Superstar"

not doubting his stardom, but 2 of the most experianced defenders, Thornton and Fergison are not "most experianced" defenders

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Tom Hawkins (footballer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Unfortunately this article has substantial issues that mean it fails the criteria:

*Fails 1b as the lead is defiantly not long enough. It should be around least 2-3 detailed paragraphs (see WP:LEDE)

• Fails 2b as three paragraphs in the "AFL career" section are unreferenced
• Fails 3a by a long way due to the article having no information (prose) about his career post 2013, a time in which he has won the Geelong leading goal kicker award three times.

I am going to leave this open for seven days and if no significant action is taken I will close this GAR and delist the article. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Yellow Dingo, please don't start your seven-day wait until you have notified major contributing editors and relevant WikiProjects for the article, so they know that the reassessment is beginning. The GAR instructions are very clear that these steps are needed at the start of a GAR, whether individual or community. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: i did. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Yellow Dingo, notifying a single editor who hasn't edited the article since 2010 and has only edited Wikipedia on a couple of days this year is not adequate. I have taken it upon myself to notify Flickerd, as the registered user who appears most active on the article at present, and also the relevant WikiProjects (the Sports and Games workgroup of Biography, and Australian rules football), which the GAR instructions note should be done. Please allow a full seven days from now for some response. Remember that the ultimate goal/hope of a GAR is to get the article back up to GA level, not to delist, though the latter may ultimately be necessary. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

I also have to disagree in part with your first "Fails" item, about the lead. The proper length WP:LEAD gives for an article that's under 15,000 prose characters (and this one is about half that) is one to two paragraphs, not two to three. Further, the intro should be a concise summary of the various sections of the article rather than detailed, and not contain any significant information that is not also in the body of the article. It certainly needs a major expansion from what it is now, since it gives almost no information at all about him or his career; I agree that the article fails 1b. (The GA standards were much looser back in 2007, when this article was originally listed.) BlueMoonset (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Thanks for notifying the relevant parties, I didn't realise it was compulsory. And on your second point, when I said 2-3 paragraphs I was referring to a lead for an article that meets 3a not the current article. Sorry if that wasn't clear. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 02:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

I've just added refs to the three paragraphs that were missing them and some tidying and small expansions. I'll come back and attempt to expand the lead per BlueMoonset's recommended length and add prose from 2013 to 2016. Flickerd (talk) 02:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

I've now updated the article to eliminate the issues that were brought up. I've added prose for his career from 2013 to 2016, and in all honesty, I don't follow Hawkins' career that closely so I've written a bit of a foundation for each season if anyone chooses to expand upon them in the future, and I just tried to pull main parts from sources, as I was a bit concerned about falling into WP:RECENTISM. The content in the lead was drawn from other WP:GA and WP:FL in the AFL project. Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 06:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

• Nice job Flickerd I'm happy to close this as keep now. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

copyediting?

I skimmed through the page and found quite a few misplaced commas and other issues that make it baffling that this article was ever given a "good" grade. While I've fixed what I found, I'm not confident enough to call this a "good" article without further review. In my opinion, a "good" article should be flawless when it comes to matters of grammar and punctuation (at least at such time the article is reviewed). I think the GA status should be reviewed again, as it has been more than six years. Electricmaster (talk) 13:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Tom Hawkins (footballer, born 1988)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

This article has not been updated sufficiently since its last reassessment in 2016, meaning it fails WP:GACR criterion 3a). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Concur. I move for GA status demotion until updates have been made and a reassessment issued. Thank you.

Electricmaster (talk) 07:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.