Talk:Tomislav Brkić
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Agathoclea in topic Move discussion in progress
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Tomislav Brkic → Tomislav Brkić – There was no consensus regarding the use of diacritics, so this article should use the diacritics until a consensus is reached. See also: Talk:Mate Pavić.
PL Alvarez Talk, 07:58, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - As per the ATP and ITF tennis organizations, and Davis Cup, the player's English sourced name is Tomislav Brkic. See also Talk:Marek Zidlicky and Talk:Galina Fokina. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. The Associated Press gives this name without a diacritic. Kauffner (talk) 11:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Do you actually expect people to comment on all 9 move requests? Why not create it as a multi-move so that discussion doesn't get split or become redundant? Powers T 13:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- According to wiki we are supposed to look at these on a case by case basis. He's just trying to usurp all pages listed without diacritics. Even this opening rfm is weird... if there is no consensus the page should remain as it always has. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose all nine of these RMs due to the flawed nomination. Basically saying 'there is no consensus on this issue, so we should go with my personal preference' is not a valid rationale. Jenks24 (talk) 18:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose There is no discussion on diacritics on this talk page, so nominator's rationale is superfluous, so this move is missing a rationale. 65.94.77.11 (talk) 06:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose: The proposed page move is contrary to the established Wiki-policies of WP:UE, WP:COMMONNAME, and WP:RS. Dolovis (talk) 03:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Accurate and full name first in BLP lede
editPutting this on a couple of Talk pages. WP:Manual_of_Style/Biographies#First_mention states:
"While the article title should generally be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, the subject's full name should be given in the lead paragraph, if known."
None of the examples given in the guideline support the way this article first line is formatted. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Isn't the subject's full name given in the lead paragraph? Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Gerard Solves - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 03:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Gérard Solvès - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 18:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Page has been moved accourdingly. Agathoclea (talk) 05:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.