Talk:Transdev Blazefield

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Transdev Blazefield is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Head office Harrogate according to subsidiary article so added to WP Yorkshire

Needs info box - --BulldozerD11 (talk) 02:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Red links

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has a lot of red links scattered everywhere, could do with a tidy up DG6985 (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I have proposed that Yorkshire Coastliner be merged here.--Charles (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

~~No Need for it to move has sufficient information AskhamBogs (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2013 (UTC)~~ Blocked for sockpuppetry. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Seems appropriate with what has happened with transdev York. Tom the Tomato (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sources

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Have found an article about Blazefield that might be useful: "Blazefield: Going for growth". busandcoach.com. Plum Publishing Ltd. 13 February 2007.. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Split proposal

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Earlier in 2013 it was agreed that Transdev York and Yorkshire Coastliner would be merged into the Transdev Blazefield page. Based on the size of the articles, a fair decision.

Transdev Blazefield is a subsidiary of Transdev and has six distinct bus companies operating under it. Currently four, Burnley & Pendle, Harrogate & District, Keighley & District, Lancashire United, have their own pages while Transdev York and Yorkshire Coastliner are included on this page.

In the interests of consistency, I believe all six subsidiaries need to be combined on this page, or have an individual page? Given the size of the four that are stand alone, I am leaning toward the latter.Mo7838 (talk) 20:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Per WP:BRANCH they should all be merged here and I am planning to do so when I get time. None of them are very big especially once the cruft is trimmed out.--Charles (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

They are supposed to be each a sperate page as information on them was deleted without reason as for Transdev York it had information about them and the routes and other parts like Unibus, and Coastliner shouldn't of been mereged her as all you need is links to each pages not on in one. Jbicky00 (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Transdev Blazefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic