While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Text and/or other creative content from Murdaugh family was copied or moved into Trial of Alex Murdaugh with this edit on January 25, 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I'm trying to track down reliable source, but didn't Buster (on Feb 21) essentially contradict what his father testified about his voice being heard on the video recorded? This is under the "Testimony" section. I think this should be included. Otherwise, the very simplistic "the defense called the defendant's son, Buster, to the stand", doesn't really explain much. conman33 (. . .talk)06:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Conman33: Nope, this is a journalist from SC and he says the state did not ask Buster that question. I watched the whole thing and don't remember them asking him that question either.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is it normal in South Carolina following a capital murder (where the death penalty could be applied) conviction for sentencing to occur the very next day? In most high profile cases, sentencing occurs weeks later if not longer. Perhaps this could be explored in the article, citing reliable references of course. Juneau Mike (talk) 19:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't think it needs to be discussed. It's not really relevant. If there's some analysis about that later in the media or other sources, then sure but for now, it's not needed and would unencyclopedic in my opinion. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Special:Diff/1200758080/1201349915 - Google search on "only three hours" and "Alex Murdaugh" it brings up many sources that use this exact wording, including the NYT. Three hours for jury deliberations in such a major case that went on for so long is absolutely a notably short time, intentionally excluding it would be a minority POV. I added a WaPo source but there are too many to list here. -- GreenC21:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@GreenC I'd be more comfortable with "3 hours, which observers regarded as short." or even "less than 3 hours". "Only" is an opinion, and the key point is that we shouldn't be editorialising. Although, the main reason I deleted it has been addressed, the original source did not support the contention it was short and it was appropriate to remove given it was contentious and unsourced. Local Variable (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
He made a plea deal (details of which I don't know) that resulted in the indictments reduced from 101 to 22.
He was tried by the state in state court for the 22 indictments, and received 27 years.
He was tried by the Feds in Federal court for either the same or different 22 indictments (I don't know). He received 40 years, and a fine.
If anyone wants to untangle this legal mess with sources that would be great. Many sources contain inaccurate information because they are/were also confused. -- GreenC21:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
