Talk:Triggermen

Latest comment: 12 years ago by MichaelQSchmidt in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. This is an informative insight to the film Triggermen and without this page Wikipedia users would have absolutely no information regarding this film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.249.174 (talkcontribs) 23:27, 17 March 2012

  • I agree. I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm sorry but I have to disagree. How is this in any way an "informative insight to the film" when all it contains is a list of the director, producer, and a few cast members? And the statement that "without this page Wikipedia would have absolutely no information regarding this film" is incorrect. They can easily look it up on IMDB or Rotten Tomatoes and find ten times the amount of information on the film there. This film does not pass the notability guideline for films. Rotten tomatoes shows zero critic reviews for the film, it hasn't received any awards, and I doubt it is historically notable. I'm going to have to send it to AfD. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination

edit