 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Disagree
editI disagree with the 'citation needed' here. The article appeals to common sense in "One would think", "Should be", and "has a dilemma". What sort of citations could cover this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.151.119 (talk) 07:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
In popular culture: season 5 of "Justified"?
editWould it be worth mentioning that season 5 of Justified make several indirect references to this as the "21-foot rule"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.211.107 (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
A scientific examination of the 21-foot rule
editA scientific examination of the 21-foot rule https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15614263.2020.1772785 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:CDA0:1060:398D:8970:4140:43B4 (talk) 12:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Mythbuster
editAssuming all other things being equal and correct, the Mythbusters reference should either be removed entirely or more pragmatically expanded to include the fact that the drill requires two center-of-mast shots. One shot at absolute point blank range (the attacker being close enough to grab the gun themselves) is a diffrent test, and therefore a diffrent result. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.163.44 (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Blah
editTopic is very deserving of inclusion, I can say as someone who got shafted by the cops. This article, however, is POV cop trash and in need of a complete rewrite. 76.70.97.144 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)