Talk:Tukgahgo Mountain
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Kevmin in topic "intrusive" craton?
 | Tukgahgo Mountain was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 28, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during sampling in 1991, a geologic formation near Tukgahgo Mountain was informally named "Chilly"? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
"Minerals"
editAs a note none of he minerals listed in the lead are actually minerals. All are elements, with the exception of quartzite, which is a rock. Also the site referenced in ref three is Mindat.org, not "Mindata organization" and the Tukgahgo Mountain entry there shows no listings for native silver, gold, platinum or palladium. THe name "chilly is an informal name and needs to be noted as such.--Kevmin § 02:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
"intrusive" craton?
edit"In 1984, Redman((who)) and others had inferred that the intrusive rocks were part of the Mount Kashagnak pluton." "Redman", unlike Dante or Shakespeare, needs identifying. Since a craton is generally pre-existing, how can an intrusion be "part"?--Wetman (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- Who said anything about a Craton? The link and the sentence are fine from what I see as they are talking about plutons not cratons.--Kevmin § 23:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)