| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Turan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Pan-Turks are vandalizing and distorting this article with their fictional history books.
editDiana_marlisto is vandalizing this page with pan-Turkism propaganda. Be very cautious of this user.
Dehkhoda source
editWhy is the dehkhoda marked as an inadequate source and that a better source is needed? It is arguably the most reliable Persian dictionary of modern times ParsaPbt (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Turan - Is Turkic, not Iranian.
editWhen the Turks used this term, or name. They even gave this name to a region of the Mediterranean Sea.
Y = u Tyrhennia/Turhannia
Like Odin said he came from Tyrkland, Turkland.
....There was no Iran, back then. Iran was many time ruled by Turks.
Iranians are in the farrest history even Turks, read and learn and educate yourself before making the truth dirty, and a lie.
Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico? 89.205.128.211 (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- imagine arguing and making up so much lies that no one even entertains you panturkists anymore, imagine having such a sad history that you have you in Europe to call yourselfs the original blond haired and blue eyed europeans and in persia the original children of iran, i am waiting for the day your people will say cyrus the great was a turk. 46.251.152.200 (talk) 10:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Turkification of Turan
editThe Article must contain all of the beliefs and theories and not focus on one source of information, Turkic people have different opinions about Turan and it's bold enough to be mentioned in the article which positively effects the Turco-Persian argument going on about the article and the ongoing edit-war
No sources or beliefs are considered to be 100% right about a historical article so do not attempt to delete or undo the added information even if the details are in opposition with the confirmed text of the article
All opinions and theories must be contained in historical articles considering that all sources are not completely right.
please do not change the information contained in the edit and let all theories to be discussed. IlyaSurkhayovic (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please read WP:RS, WP:CS and WP:UNDUE. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- @HistoryofIran The Sources were mentioned in the article IlyaSurkhayovic (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Where? The primary source (WP:PST) you just cited with no pages? [1]. Stop edit warring and read our rules. The sourced sections of this article clearly contradicts what you're trying to add, which is essentially psuedo-history. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- @HistoryofIran The Sources were mentioned in the article IlyaSurkhayovic (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)