Talk:Turtle (submersible)/GA2

Latest comment: 5 years ago by BlueMoonset in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
There are two [citation needed] tags in the Preparations for use section and the Aftermath section is almost entirely unsourced. The article fails GA criteria #2. L293D ( • ) 13:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • That there is so little evidence the craft existed (a few vague letters) needs to be mentioned earlier.
    The drawings need further explanation in the text. The image on the left is of a drawing made by Lieutenant Commander Francis Barber in 1875 from a description in a letter from Benjamin Gale to Silas Deane. The right hand image, I know less about. It appears to come from an 1801 magazine by the American Philosophical Society but is presented in this article as contemporary. Without this knowledge, one is left wondering why the two drawings are so different.
    The image "Destruction of a British tender by a torpedo" is not explained in the text contrary to 6b The explosion occured when the British seamen brought the mines on board and began tampering with them, and therefore the article calls this attempt a failure but without the full story, it sounds more like a success.
    Neither am I convinced the article is focussed. It spends too much time discussing attempted attacks by mines and torpedoes in which the Turtle wasn't used. Is this article about Turtle or is it about early underwater warfare in general?
    Comments from --Ykraps (talk) 21:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • @L293D: Is this ready to be closed. AIRcorn (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply