Talk:Typhoon Haikui (2012)
 | A news item involving Typhoon Haikui (2012) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 August 2012. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png)
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2012 Pacific typhoon season was copied or moved into Typhoon Haikui with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
ITN nom
editThis article has been nomination for In The News; you can comment on its candidacy here. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 03:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Article title
editThe article has now been moved a few times between "Typhoon Haikui" and "Typhoon Haikui (2012)". The latter disambiguator is unnecessary, as Wikipedia has no other Typhoon Haikui pages. Should another typhoon be named this a decade in the future, the pages can be disambiguated then; in the meantime, WP:PRECISION seems to me to ask us to keep the title simple. Khazar2 (talk) 13:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
JTWC prognostic reasonings──Haikui
edit2012 Philippine floods
edit2012 Philippine floods redirects to this article, but there's also 2012 Philippines flooding. Shouldn't it redirect there? —Ynhockey (Talk) 08:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Typhoon Haikui. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WWJP25-RJTD_201208011200.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/wt/wtpn21.pgtw..txt
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPN33-PGTW_201208022100.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ22-RJTD_201208030000.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPN33-PGTW_201208040300.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ22-RJTD_201208051200.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/shanghai-east-china-braces-typhoon-haikui-16945073
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 23 October 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Requester was CheckUser blocked (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 02:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Typhoon Haikui → Typhoon Haikui (2012) – Name was not retired yet, see Typhoon Sanba (2012) N-C16 (talk) 04:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 04:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose It's the only usage of the storm. YE Pacific Hurricane 13:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 13 November 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved(non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 11:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Typhoon Haikui → Typhoon Haikui (2012) – Although this is the only storm of this name, the name is not retired yet, and this storm is not very notable that can be a primary topic. 203.186.21.99 (talk) 05:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- No, that's not how it works. It was the only storm of the name, so it doesn't need a year identifier. It doesn't matter if it is the primary topic or not. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose There was an RfC about this very issue, which argues in favor of the current title. Pppery 18:37, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.