Talk:Ušće Towers

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Maikel in topic Empty
Former featured article candidateUšće Towers is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 17, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted

Nikola Kavaja

edit

I've made several changes in the section about intended terrorist attack by Kavaja. First of all, his last name is Kavaja, not Kavaji. I removed the statement that if succeeds, the attack would put an end to communism in Yugoslavia (I simply don't know where the idea came from, but it's very unlikely). His intention was to kill Tito (ironically, Tito allegedly entered the building only once). -- Obradović Goran (talk 21:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


This article needs to be edited, full of spelling and grammar mistakes... I have no time and inclinations to do so, sorry but my life does not involve around wiki.

Also many facts in this article are make belief, simply we need accurate source for every fact that is being presented in the article. 88.111.164.220 12:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Usce Tower Height Disputed

edit

Ušće Tower's height (claimed to be 148 m) is disputed because Serbs added simple atnenne on top of the building so they could claim the tallest building in the Balkans after Bosmal was built. In strict architectural terms, adding separate anthene on a building does not count toward its structural height.Bosniak (talk) 05:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


The height is bloody mess. Nobody seems to freaking know it: even the sources are conflicting. The previous version of this article was rightfully ridiculed on this forum http://www.skyscrapercity.com/archive/index.php/t-519256.html. RTS and Kurir say 140/141 m [1], and earlier sources, like Danas, say 134. This is apparently with antenna included.

Roof height is also a mystery. Pretty much all sources say it's 105 m, but it's unclear if it's before or after the reconstruction. 2 floors were really added in 2003, and they're extra-high, as it can be seen on picture, so they add up to some 10m. So the people http://www.skyscrapercity.com/archive/index.php/t-519256.html concluded that it's some 115 m now, and it makes sense, but I can't verify it. Note that the antenna is fairly high, some 20-30 m at least. List of tallest buildings in Serbia says 115, but without source.

Further, the antenna has always existed. At least, it can be seen in the 1999 Vreme photo [2]. No such user (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Observation Deck

edit

I visited the Usce tower recently, and I found the observation deck to be closed to the public. The receptionist informed me that there were plans to open it to the public in the future.Addejong89 (talk) 20:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ušće Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ušće Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ušće Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Empty

edit

The new tower seems to be empty. Maikel (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply