![]() | USS Sargent Bay has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 2, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Sargent Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 05:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
edit1. Well-written
- Prose is clear, concise, and understandable, with proper spelling and grammar
- Lead
- Layout Possibly The section for USS Sargent Bay#Construction is only two sentences long. It would be good to expand this section, although I understand that may not be entirely possible. This section could also be consolidated. Done
- Links Partly done Some article links, such as Operation Magic Carpet are linked in the article multiple times. Generally links should only be used in the first appearance of the topic in an article (not counting the infobox). Also, the redlink to William Theodore Rassieur should probably be dealt with. Done
- Buzzwords
- Fiction not an issue with this topic
- Lists not applicable
2. Verifiable
- List of references properly formatted Partly done It looks like refs 5 and 8 should be consolidated into a single named ref, since they appear to be quoting the same page of the same book. Done
- Inline citations from reliable sources Partly done. Can you add inline citations to the various dates in the infobox for verifiability? The dates are cited in the article so it's not a big deal, but having citations there would be nice.
- Content cited in article, not big deal.
- No original research (none that I can detect).
- No COPYVIO I tested several sentences throughout the article, and they came up clean.
3. Broad in coverage
- Covers main aspects Design, construction, and service history properly detailed.
- Stays focused on topic
4. Neutral
5. Stable
6. Illustrated if possible
- Media tagged for copyright details All media tagged as public domain.
- Media relevant
- @Hog Farm: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Issues mentioned have been addressed. Good job, User:Stikkyy.
- @Hog Farm: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)