Talk:USS Sargent Bay/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 05:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Well-written

Prose is clear, concise, and understandable, with proper spelling and grammar Y

Lead Y

Layout  Possibly The section for USS Sargent Bay#Construction is only two sentences long. It would be good to expand this section, although I understand that may not be entirely possible. This section could also be consolidated.  Done

Links  Partly done Some article links, such as Operation Magic Carpet are linked in the article multiple times. Generally links should only be used in the first appearance of the topic in an article (not counting the infobox). Also, the redlink to William Theodore Rassieur should probably be dealt with.  Done

Buzzwords Y

Fiction Y not an issue with this topic

Lists Y not applicable

2. Verifiable

List of references properly formatted  Partly done It looks like refs 5 and 8 should be consolidated into a single named ref, since they appear to be quoting the same page of the same book.  Done

Inline citations from reliable sources  Partly done. Can you add inline citations to the various dates in the infobox for verifiability? The dates are cited in the article so it's not a big deal, but having citations there would be nice.

Content cited in article, not big deal.

No original research Y (none that I can detect).

No COPYVIO Y I tested several sentences throughout the article, and they came up clean.

3. Broad in coverage

Covers main aspects Y Design, construction, and service history properly detailed.

Stays focused on topic Y

4. Neutral Y

5. Stable Y

6. Illustrated if possible

Media tagged for copyright details Y All media tagged as public domain.

Media relevant Y

@Hog Farm: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Issues mentioned have been addressed. Good job, User:Stikkyy.