Talk:USS William H. Standley

Untitled

I really didn't think that anyone would contest the change I made, changing the definition of the hull designation of DLG from "Frigate" to "Destroyer Leader", but here we are.

If you go to the U.S. Navy's website [1] and search for "DLG", you will find a series of articles in which DLG is either defined as "guided missile destroyer" or guided missile destroyer leader". There are only two pages that define DLG as "guided missile frigate" and one is a copy of the other.

In addition, no one I know that ever served aboard a DLG (while it was a DLG) would have called their ship a "frigate".

The only reference to them being Frigates in the Navy.mil website is on a handful of ship histories, but not all of them.

I don't know who called them "frigates" but the Navy doesn't (and didn't) and the sailors that served on them don't (and didn't.)

I also would like to call your attention to the USS Norfolk (DL-1), the USS Mitscher (DL-2), the USS John S. McCain (DL-3), the USS Willis A. Lee (DL-4), and the USS Wilkinson (DL-5). If a DL is a Destroyer Leader, why isn't a DLG a Guided Missile Destroyer Leader?

-TCav 02:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Please see centralized discussion at Talk:USS Fox (CG-33). TomTheHand 15:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on USS William H. Standley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050213162447/http://www.history.navy.mil:80/danfs/w8/william_h_standley.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/w8/william_h_standley.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050223214244/http://www.cg-32.com:80/cg-32/decomm.htm to http://www.cg-32.com/cg-32/decomm.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Depth

Article says the ship is at a depth of 4,526 fathoms (27,156 feet). It won't make much of an artificial reef at the depth. Is that the correct number? 2001:56A:F414:D300:D87F:2620:C605:CF1D (talk) 04:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Most probably not, the location on ocean maps seems to be more compatible with it being 4,526 m, not fathoms. nihil (talk) 15:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)