Talk:Ubayd Allah ibn Ziyad

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ubayd Allah ibn Ziyad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Islam: Salaf High‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Salaf task force.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Middle East / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Himyarite Kingdom#Tribal presence in Syria and Egypt (7th–8th centuries)|Himyar]] The anchor (#Tribal presence in Syria and Egypt (7th–8th centuries)) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I figure I should move the hadiths about this man to this spot... (Zimriel 23:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC))Reply

Ibn Abihi

Zimriel, why did you remove this?

"In 664 Mu`awiyah replaced him with Ziyad ibn Abu Sufyan, often called "Ibn Abihi (son of his own [unknown] father)", who became famed for his Draconian methods of public order"

--Striver 5 July 2005 04:13 (UTC)

Striver: I wanted this text to refer more specifically to Ubayd Allah "Ibn-Ibn-Abihi" and not to Ibn Abihi himself. I did not mean to offend. Zimriel 27 Jan 2006 17:13

The place of controversy

Anonymous one "70.28.168.172":

I couldn't help but notice that you deleted the bibliography and wrote, "it is historically a false story, both in place and time.you mixed two different events together. the story above is not more than a false connection between two events happened in diferent times and diferent places and the whole story is historically incorrect."

If this is so, then your task is to make your case in the Discussion section. Also, it is hardly ethical to remove bibliographical references which might provide the evidence for which you seek.

--Zimriel 27 Jan 2006 17:13

Add topic