Talk:Unionist Party (Punjab)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Andrew Gwilliam in topic Neutrality

Untitled

edit

This article is totally and completely inaccurate.

1-The party's name was Unionist Party. It was an alliance of Muslim feudals and Hindu industrialists.

2- It seconded Muslim League's Lahore resolution.

3- All India Muslim League of Jinnah's did not ask for the partitioning of Punjab and Bengal.

4- Khizer Hayat Tiwana was NOT the son of Sikandar Hayat. Sikandar Hayat's son Shaukat Hayat was with Jinnah. -- unsigned comment by 203.81.196.194 13:06, 16 March 2006

Plase put your "CORECTIONS:" section on this talk page, not on article itself... AnonMoos 13:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

edit

"were the twin founders of this great party." for instance, lots of other pov stuff I can see just scanning the page aswell. AlexTG (talk) 00:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've done my best to strip out all explicitly POV stuff from the article, as well as making a few other changes. Hopefully it's now a reasonable article for an expert to expand upon. Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC).Reply