Talk:United States Southern Command
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Southern Command article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIs the head of Southern Command given or is the government in the process of deciding on a new one? I ask because I can't find a link to the general or admiral in charge. Monksbane 4:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Updates on command transformation provided in official capacity...Erik J. Leklem, Chief, Whole-of-Government Initiatives, Partnering Directorate, Headquarters, U.S. Southern CommandEleklem (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)E.Leklem
Ths USA = moving more nations from south to Northcommand?
edit"Significant changes made by UCP 2008 include:
- Realigning the USNORTHCOM and U.S. Southern Command areas of responsibility (AOR) by placing the Bahamas, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the Turks and Caicos Islands in the USNORTHCOM AOR. "
NPOV, history missing
editI've slapped an NPOV template onto this page, because it's very imbalanced and biased towards SOUTHCOM/the US military. Most of the (few) sources are in fact affiliated with the US military, and I find it strange that, one the one hand, there's a rather long and praising section called "Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief" while on the other hand, in the History section, the entire period 1963-1996 is missing (!). Qwertyus (talk) 10:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Personnel numbers
edit"USSOUTHCOM is a joint command[1] of more than 1,200 military and civilian personnel representing the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and several other federal agencies." This seems a bit low? Mcsteez (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Suggestion or merely a talk line. "...when it comes to under whose boots you prefer to be under, we all choose USA...! as nobody would prefer to be under Russia, China or Cuban communism influence! ...so we eliminate the section of human rights complaints against USA! as there is no comparison to the worst in this World.." 2001:569:7DC7:6700:F49F:627C:BE5C:9B42 (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- I removed, but not for any of these reasons. The center is under the NDU and not SOUTHCOM, as was erroneously stated.Garuda28 (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
"Controversies"?
editThis sentence from the intro seems unjustified: "As explained below, USSOUTHCOM has been under scrutiny due to several human rights and rule of law controversies in which it has been embroiled for nearly a decade." The only mention of rule-of-law and human-rights violations were not about USSOUTHCOM. The only controversy I could find was about the soldiers who got prostitutes. I recommend removal. Jess_Riedel (talk) 03:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed and done. - wolf 07:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)