Talk:Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

Sony Canada crave streaming deal

You forgot to add in that Sony signed a cravetv deal in Canada with crave starting in April 2023 which includes ATSV kraven, madame web 2605:B100:50E:5D30:B816:8BB9:2EA:FC1C (talk) 21:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Well 2605:B100:51F:977A:F567:F8B7:8:AB46 (talk) 12:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Request to edit - Lego Spider-Man and contributions

Hey all, I want to add the entrance of Peter Parker of the Lego Spider-Man universe (Earth-13122) to the plot portion. The change would give Preston Mutanga (the animator of the scene) his due credit in more than just the animation section (Miguel learns about the anomaly (Spot) through this scene.) Peytune (talk) 19:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJrCRzpfdQ0&ab_channel=LegoMe_TheOG (the Lego scene mentioned) Peytune (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Don’t know whether this should be added or not?

Recently discovered a bit of information and seeing as I usually only edit filmography and studio information I’m not really the one to write up information like this. So I figured I’d leave it here and let everyone else decide. Joaquim Dos Santos, who was one of the directors of Across the Spider-Verse and the upcoming Beyond the Spider-Verse mevoie revealed in an interview that he actually had a meeting with the Lord about working on the first Spider-Verse movie but couldn’t due to being contracted to work on Voltron Legendary Defender at the time. Link - https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/anime/exclusive-joaquim-dos-santos-shares-his-love-for-anime-reflects-on-his-journey-and-talks-spider-man-across-the-spider-verse-1285246 Max1057 (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Quote or NPOV?

The article mentions one of the goals stated by the producers being "to not repurpose other artists' work plagiarized by AI." It doesn't indicate if this is a direct quote. The ethics of generative AI are heavily debated; if this isn't a quote, it's NPOV, and if it is a quote it's (ironically) plagiarism. If it's a paraphrase, it's appropriate to put "plagiarized" in quotes, but better to use a direct quote because using quotes around a word can be used to convey skepticism.

Ethics debates around generative AI often devolve into a stalemate argument with one side arguing that humans somehow invent "new" art with no explanation while the AI just "copies" what it took in and spits out some amalgamation of everything it's seen; while the other side argues that humans actually Thomas Hobbes, and just "copy" what they've taken in and spit out some amalgamation as "new" art. This opens the door for questions of whether a human drawing anime-style characters with spiky hair is plagiarizing Akira Toriyama's work, and how it's different from a generative AI that's been trained on sources including Akira Toriyama's work.

It's essentially a debate between formalism versus intentionalism: if the output is original, then it's original, as per formalism; or, if the human takes in the work of many artists and creates an original work, they are applying the subjective human experience with the intent to create an original work, so even if it is just a rehash of everything they've seen in their life bent into a new shape it's still a matter of intent and thus original, while a machine applying exactly the same mathematical process as said human's neurons to arrive at the same result doesn't have feelings so can't have real intent and is just making a derivative work as per intentionalism. John Moser (talk) 02:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)