 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | The contents of the Vaghela page were merged into Vaghela dynasty. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Result is Merge.
Merger proposal
editI propose to merge Vaghela into Vaghela dynasty as they seem to be of the same subject. In fact, they were both copy pasted by User:Sachaai in 13 July 2009. --Muhandes (talk) 22:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Vaghela are sub caste of Nai?
editIf Vaghela are not sub caste or surname of Nai caste so why Nai caste article state that vaghela is division of nai caste? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharari (talk • contribs) 01:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Dispute
editPlease see WP:SYNTH first user:Chariotrider555 you took the source where they are described as rajputs later you used the source of Cynthia where she mentions rajput Identity didn't exist in 12th cent it didn't mentions vaghela trying to connect them is purely WP:UNDUE WP:OR and violation of WP:SYNTH42.106.196.88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- If neither Jackson nor Talbot mentions that Vaghelas specifically as Rajputs in later times, then there is no reason for the entire statement to even be there. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Fine.42.106.196.88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)