Talk:Vaman Srinivas Kudva
This article was nominated for deletion on August 14, 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article needs a serious rewrite. I haven't ever heard of this person before, so it might be better if someone with a better background took a look at this. On the other hand I don't even know if this person is noteable enough to deserve an article. It reads a lot like it was written by a friend or family member. NoIdeaNick 13:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- It is pretty obvious that the article was written by a relative. Since the user who wrote it has the same surname as the person in the article. Since I am from the same city as this person, and I do remember from what I used to be told that he has done a great deal of things for the city and that he was very famous. The article however does requires a rewrite with a NPOV, preferably not by a relative;-)--Sureshkamath 04:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Looks like this is getting personal
I agree - Looks like this is maintained by friends/ relatives, and used to have personal spats. I think this should be deleted Nora123 17:32, 21 April 2006
- Looks like you created your identity just to insert this one line here.--Sureshkamath 10:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Why should an article be deleted just because a friend or family member is maintaining it? It doesn't make sense. Wikipedia has over 1 million articles, some of them will be articles maintained by people to whom the subject is near.--Sureshkamath 11:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Some vandals are using my name on the article and implying i have edited the same. Have sent a request to remedy and review this article and determine whether this should be removed Mallyar 00:35, 22 April 2006
- Rajesh please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.--Sureshkamath 10:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Rajesh, It is pretty obvious that you were the vandal. You had defaced this article on the 23rd of October 05, 6th April 06, and 21st April. It is only after the edit of 9th April 06 (the one you say are implying that the vandalism is yours) that the 21st April edit takes place, and further you surface to make the above statement, and then delete it. Obviously looking at the number of saved edits made by you, you are not aware that the preview feature exists. Also it is quite shameful that you would deface your own grandfather's biographical page just for some petty family differences that you have. You cannot deny this since I have traced the IP addresses to your company. From the time and date stamp it will be very easy to trace it to your work station you know.--Sureshkamath 11:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Vaman Srinivas Kudva. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071007035100/http://www.rotarymangalore.org/ to http://www.rotarymangalore.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)