This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@Paper9oll according to Wikipedia:Notability (academics), a person is notable if The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. Rashtrapati Award (National President award) is one of the highest national awards of the government of India. 202.134.9.139 (talk) 09:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @202.134.9.139 As stated, your submission was rejected for sourcing. As per WP:CONPOL, in particularly WP:BLP and WP:VERIFY, any materials must be sourced otherwise it should be removed, in which you had failed to do so. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @202.134.9.139 Kindly learn how to read first before replying, and please reply here only to centralized the discussion. Fyi, as new page reviewer, I have the rights to either accept or reject your submission however as stated above and earlier through AfC comments, your submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources so it's your WP:BURDEN to address the concerns raised yourself by either sourcing them or removing it. It was rejected for sourcing NOT for notability. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: You can not decline because source for notability criteria of award is given here.[1][2][3] which you can verify through google translate (the last and main source is in English). You can add tags to add sources for other parts or may delete the unsourced parts but can not decline the proposal. 202.134.9.139 (talk) 10:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @202.134.9.139 See my replies above and STOP spamming otherwise I will have to consider it as disruptive editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll, the issues have been solved. Now you can review. 202.134.9.158 (talk) 17:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @202.134.9.158 Why is 7 of the works in Draft:Ved Prakash Upaddhay#Work not sourced? Please source them if it's sourceable otherwise remove it per WP:VERIFY. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll, removed. Is it ok now? 202.134.9.158 (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @202.134.9.158 Done — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll, removed. Is it ok now? 202.134.9.158 (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @202.134.9.139 See my replies above and STOP spamming otherwise I will have to consider it as disruptive editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: You can not decline because source for notability criteria of award is given here.[1][2][3] which you can verify through google translate (the last and main source is in English). You can add tags to add sources for other parts or may delete the unsourced parts but can not decline the proposal. 202.134.9.139 (talk) 10:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @202.134.9.139 Kindly learn how to read first before replying, and please reply here only to centralized the discussion. Fyi, as new page reviewer, I have the rights to either accept or reject your submission however as stated above and earlier through AfC comments, your submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources so it's your WP:BURDEN to address the concerns raised yourself by either sourcing them or removing it. It was rejected for sourcing NOT for notability. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ "डॉ वेद प्रकाश उपाध्याय को मिलेगा राष्ट्रपति सम्मान-2018". khaskhabar. 20 August 2018. Retrieved 10 August 2019.
- ^ "डॉ. वेद प्रकाश उपाध्याय को राष्टऊपति सम्मान". aggarjanpatrika.com. 9 April 2019. Retrieved 10 August 2019.
- ^ "Presidential Awards Scheme". Central Sanskrit University. Retrieved 21 July 2023.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.