This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Redtigerxyz Talk 05:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - User:Redtigerxyz this is malformed, can you please replace with the multimove template to also request move Veena to Veena (disambiguation).
- On the face of it oppose - no evidence presented that this use of Veena outnumbers all other Veenas put together. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- In ictu oculi, corrected the RM. All Veenas in Musical instruments section of the disambig are types of the Veena. In terms of "long-term significance", the musical instrument is more significant than all the people called Veena. --Redtigerxyz Talk 11:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Long term significance as pointed out by Redtigerxyz is for the instrument only. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 12:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Photo Change
editShouldn't there be a different photo in this Wikipedia article, than the competing Saraswati Veena article, as this appears to be an example specific to Saraswati Veena? As it turns out, there are at least 7 types of Veenas, so maybe we shouldn't overlap the distinctions of the 2 categories? Does someone that is interested know how to work the Wikipedia photo library? I don't. Stevenmitchell (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)