Talk:Via Francigena

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Backpacking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stages of the Via Francigena was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 05 December 2008 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Via Francigena. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A little puzzle I don’t understand the logic of this passage.

It is not exact to consider "via Francigena" the whole route used by archibishop Sigeric in the year 990, because the name Francigena means "generated in France" in Latin. So, only the Italian part of the route can be named "Francigena".

Can anyone clarify it please? —Ian Spackman 11:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, the translation was wrong and so it was the rest. I corrected it. --Munifico (talk) 21:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A note on "comprises" and "includes"

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It comprises several possible routes. This was miscorrecrted to "includes." For those whose vocabulary doesn't include "comprises", an easy device to remember is that with "includes" one can silently add "...and much else besides". If that is not the fact, as here, then comprises is an excellent addition to one's vocabulary. --Wetman (talk) 00:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Extraneous information

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

There are many events that have happened to transpire at places along the via Francigena that have nothing to do with the subject of this article: an address by Woodrow Wilson, etc. The article is developing a trivia list.--Wetman (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I do believe that the location was chosen because of its historical importance on the route, but I have no evidence for that. If you are certain there is none, I shall be happy to delete it, or feel free to do so. Wall1fer. WALL1FER (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have got quite a good .jpg of St Bernard. but how does it go on the page assuming everybody else is happy with the idea?

Also, as Wetman says, it is getting quite long; perhaps the "Stages of the via Francigena" could be a separate page.

The subject for example of "The Via Francigena through Lausanne" alone, is probably written up in quite a few books over the years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WALL1FER (talk • contribs) 17:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

My motive for editing in the way I am doing, is partly selfish, in that I am hoping to cycle the route on my wheel chair next year, and to get the best out of it for the development of the route and as a pilgrimage/tourist route. I hope that is ok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WALL1FER (talk • contribs) 17:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Information copied from Category:Uncategorised France articles

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not quite sure what this was doing there, but I guess it belongs here...Nikkimaria (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
The Page Via Francigena, which I have added quite a bit too may be getting too long.

It may be wise to create a page called "Via Francigena Stages" distinct from the existing VF organisational pages, being a newly re-organised and constituted Pilgrim route.

Whether it is Medieval history or Modern geography is a moot point. Links to towns and villages on the Via may be either historical or geographical, depending on the antiquity of the town. One could conceivably link/wrote only about Roman ruins on or close to the via, but that would be another story altogether.

My own interest is historiography, and if such a discipline exists, in Geographical history.

It might be best to describe the whole venture of the new VF (Via Francigena) as Historiography, then different views of it from different historical perspectives would all be equally acceptable, if argued over.

Every generation may see the same historical event differently, and the picture of the differences is what we call historiography, a fast growing academic discipline.

Diverted path

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"some have worked to divert the path so that it passes around this bar or that restaurant!" Wait.. WHAT? Any reliable source? --93.147.1.45 (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Via Francigena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic