Talk:Vikram Chandra (journalist)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copy Vio

edit

I came across this stub page around 27 Sept 2012. The journalist and media executive is a significant figure in Indian mass media. I noticed that it had already been up for deletion. However, the article had multiple problems, including only 1 useful citation, peacock language, incorrect voice for an encyclopedia, and no organization as the main ones. I set out to find sources and to verify the information in the article. Finally, while I was adding references, I noticed a major copy vio (see the copy paste banner). Most of the article had been built around this content page. It looks like a press release. I had already been rewriting the page for voice. However, this may take more rewriting and verification then I have already done. In my opinion, the article could be salvaged, but please check for any remaining copyright materials and delete. Crtew (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wrong infomation

edit

The author of The Srinagar Conspiracy Novel is NOT this Vikram Chandra(Journalist)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Vikram Chandra (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply