Talk:Virginia Raggi
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 20 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Mastroiianni.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Article Critique
editHi! I’m Mastroianni and I’m an Italian user working on improving the WikiItalia project. Where does the reference of the French article come from? Since I cannot read it are they a reliable and unbiased source? So far your other links are great and reliable; however, some are in Italian and our viewers may not relate or be able to read in Italian (especially the new updates) so I will be adding some in English as well as it’s Italian equivalent. None of the ones I read were biased so they are good! Do you feel the background on her life is underrepresented? I felt the background could have more information added so I will add one thing to make it grow and inform others of what made her want to study politics Do you feel there is any information out of date? I feel the information on the buses and corruption charges are outdated; instead of taking them out because they were relevant when you wrote them, I will keep them and add the updated version so our readers can be updated.Mastroiianni (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Misleading sentence about ranking among mayors
editRaggi being 88th in a list of "administrators" that includes city mayors, around 8000, is an exceptional result that is instead portrayed negatively ("only 88th") . It's like saying that top 100 at the Boston marathon is a poor result. It may be based on expectations, but it is still better than the vast majority of competitors. Raggi is roughly in the top 1% of Italian mayors by approval rate. Unless that ranking is limited to large cities, but from the source I gather that it includes Verbania which is not large at all. So it's either a ranking of all mayors, in which case 88th is excellent, or a ranking of some mayors, in which case 88th is meaningless unless the list is well defined.