Talk:Vundavalli Aruna Kumar
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poll
editShould government intervene and liquidate Margadarsi Finance promoters assets to pay depositors? Maaparty 13:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
References
editI feel that this page needs it's references cited, as without them I'm not sure that it maintains it's NPOV. Nicwright 04:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
It is a current event and he has been parleying with leaders and hopping across places to spread his plight of innocent depositors who are at the verge of losing money to the tune of 500 million USD.
This page is prone to vandalism and hence I feel should be protected.
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Reg UNITED ANDHRAPRADESH
editthis is not the place to communicate with Vundavalli Aruna Kumar
|
---|
Respected Sir, This is Kanta Muni Sekhar from Sri Kalahasti , Chittoor (dt), Sir my humble request is only for SAMAIKYANDHRAPRADESH. Kindly please convey this message to UPA CHAIRPERSON and resolve this issue ASAP. Note: The above decision is not only myself ,the whole AP people are eagerly waiting for this . Thanks & Regards (Redacted). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.177.20.89 (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC) |
About your speach on 4th Aug.2013 at 8.00 to 9.00 pm at Rajahmundry
editthis is not the place to communicate with Vundavalli Aruna Kumar
|
---|
Dear sir, I'm a hardcore fan of your speach and United A.P, i was born and brought up at Rajahmundry, I'm working in Telengana area(including Hyderabad)from 14 years. My humble request is that,please lead the united A.P agitation in costal andhra area, there is no leader to speek like you to know the history of Andhra pradesh, and also there is no leader for the united A.P in Costal Andhra. Please conduct a meeting for all Govt.Employees unions, business people unions, private employees and worker unions in Mandal level, dist.level and guide them how to lead the united A.P agitation in Costal A.P.There is no leader to lead the united A.P agitation in Costal A.P. For Telangana agitation there is a Leadre called "KCR" but there is no leader for united A.P agitation. Thanking you, (Redacted) 13:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)122.169.235.237 (talk) |
No dissemination of Sri Krishna Committee's report-reg
editthis is NOT the place to communicate with Vundavalli Aruna Kumar
|
---|
Dear Sir, Greetings, Iam very happy to see you back in to the current agitation which was fueling by some of the beneficiarires and most of the unknown.though, here i would like to ask you few qsuestions to represent on be half of me amd my friends that, Why the Sri Krishna Committee was nominated? What was the budget proposed and from where they spent? what were the norms and conditions of the study? Why the government did not disseminated the findings of the study to both the parties(Telangana and Andhra people)? Does the Government took consent of the public(tax payers) before sanctioning the crores of rupees? so please clarify us the above... so that we can transfer the same to our friends and neighbours. Thanking You, Sincerely, [redacted] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.110.74.194 (talk) 00:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC) |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 16:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Undavalli Aruna Kumar → Undavalli Arun Kumar – It is a male name, it is Arun as the content also conveys. Vin09 (talk) 09:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - on the basis of the reasons that are given - if a man has a 'female' name, that is no reason for Wikipedia to change it. And Aruṇa of Vedic mythology is not female, unlike the modern female name of Aruṇā, so it is quite possible that some men may be so named. The subject of this article is listed in the Lok Sabha records as Vundavalli Aruna Kumar - [1] and [2]. Imc (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Vin09, can you address Imc's question? Until then, oppose from me, and it looks like it should be moved to his name given in official sources. —innotata 04:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Fine.--Vin09 (talk) 05:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.