Talk:WSBK-TV

Why didn't this affiliate with My Network TV?

With CBS' other independents joining My Network TV, and the Boston market lacking an affiliate, it only seems natural that this station would also affiliate. Any guesses why not?

What CBS indies are joining MNTV? I can't think of any offhand. I know for sure KCAL isn't - EmiOfBrie 01:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

He or she is probably referring to the CBS stations that are disaffiliating from UPN (or the WB in the case of WTCN) in light of the closure of the two networks and launch of the CW. Honestly, I don't know why WSBK is the lone holdout. —SterlingNorth 11:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

My best guess is that CBS Corp. felt the station was more profitable as an indy. Keep in mind, WSBK is a designated 'superstation,' allowing it to be carried by satellite and cable systems across the country (and Canada). Perhaps they wish to exploit that as a new source of revenue.--Bostonmediaguy 20:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

WZMY will affiliate with MyNetworkTV

Superstation status

This station is still considered a superstation and is available in Dish Networks superstation package. --Kb7oeb 08:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Possible CW affiliation?

At current, this article states that WSBK may affiliate with the CW for the 2007-2008 season. It seems that would be highly unlikely, unless the contract was written to allow the affiliation to change if a sale occurs. Remember that in the press release, the CBS Corporation and Tribune Company stations affilliating with the CW signed 10 year affilliation deals. D2001dstanley 01:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Maybe it's 'cuz Tribune is selling WLVI-TV. -- 69.70.168.98 03:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I hope they change to the CW and leave WLVI with no affiliation, I hate channel 56 now that WHDH took over, the news at 10 is awful

Won't Happen, Because Remember that in the press release, the CBS Corporation and Tribune Company stations affilliating with the CW signed 10 year affilliation deals. 12.216.123.8 14:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Logo

What happened to the main logo I posted, I posted the real one with the orange, the real one is not black!

Fair use rationale for Image:Wsbk 09 19 2006.jpg

Image:Wsbk 09 19 2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbz weather 2007.JPG

Image:Wbz weather 2007.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:TV38.jpg

Image:TV38.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Contradiction with CatholicTV

According to CatholicTV's article, the station was known as WIHS from 1955 to 1964, while WSBK did not open until 1964, holding the WIHS calls until 1966. Which is correct? -- azumanga (talk) 02:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

FoxBox on WSBK

Did you see FoxBox/4Kids TV programming shown on WSBK? True or false? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:8500:472:1D2D:6898:6164:56C2 (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Coordinate error I live in Salem and I on longer get 38 it stop a wee or to back

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

—172.56.23.147 (talk) 02:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

 Not done. You've used the coordinate-error template, but the heading you've given the post indicates that coordinates aren't the problem. The coordinates currently in the article match the transmitter location given by the FCC, so no error is apparent in that regard. If you think some other change needs to be made in the article, please post a new message below, indicating exactly what that change should be (and include a link to a source that justifies the change). Deor (talk) 12:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on WSBK-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130129182439/http://www.necn.com/03/15/10/CSN-New-England-to-televise-Revs-games/landing_sports.html?blockID=197924&feedID=3352 to http://www.necn.com/03/15/10/CSN-New-England-to-televise-Revs-games/landing_sports.html?blockID=197924&feedID=3352
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://upn38.com/wbz4news/StoryFolder/story_1532310774_html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Where's 3 stooges.no pats now

Noone cares about pats right now. Put the stooges back? 66.31.62.42 (talk) 13:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)