Talk:WarioWare: Smooth Moves/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Passed. This article meets all of the criteria for good article status.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   Prose is fluid and smooth, and most importantly, makes sense.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

   The article fits into the Manual of Style and the Video game WikiProject's guidelines for articles.

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   All sources are referenced and the references section is in accordance with theguide to layout.

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   The article has an acceptable amount of citations, and any potentially contentious remarks are cited.

   C. It contains no original research:

   There appears to be no original research.

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   The article covers all main aspects of its subject.

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

   The article is sufficiently focused and does not go into unnecessary detail.

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

   The article is without bias.

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

   The article is stable, indeed it does not seem to have been edited by anyone other than its nominator for several weeks.

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   The article's sole image is licensed properly and has good fair use rationale.

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Only one image is present (of the game's box art), but in this reviewer's opinion, additional images for this article are not required for good article status.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Excellent work.

I will add a gameplay image, I think it actually needs one. When I find an appropriate one, I will add it. Gary King (talk) 16:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)