Talk:Warner and Swasey Observatory/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Reassessment
GA Reassessment
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
I made some copy-edits for clarity. The 'Lede needs expansion - it shoul summarize the entire article.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
There are many dead links. I fixed what I could with WP:CHECKLINKS. Overall the referencing is entirely inadequate. All that is currently covered is the discoveries made by the observatory.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
OK, We need more refernces to the history and equipment of the observatory. On hold for seven days. Major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think everything was fixed. Ruslik_Zero 15:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, all seem fine now, thanks for your hard work. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: