Talk:Washington State Route 276

Washington State Route 276 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

United States: Washington / Eastern Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Washington Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Washington
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

KML and jct list

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Due to the uncertain nature of SR 276's route, a KML file and a junction list aren't necessary. Sounder Bruce 05:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 276/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 05:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sometime soon. –TC N7 JM 05:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hatting discussion. Next time wait until the first reviewer finishes to leave comments. –TC N7 JM 03:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Factually accurate and verifiable

It is factually accurate and verifiable
Has an appropriate reference section Sainid (talk) 22:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notes

The sentence "the latter averaging up to 19,000 vehicles in 2011 according to a survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) measuring average annual daily traffic (AADT)" is confusing because I'm not sure if traffic is averaging 19,000 vehicles/year or 19,000 vehicles/day. It does include a link to the average annual daily traffic, but it would be helpful to have it explicitly stated. Sainid (talk) 22:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's per day. That's what average annual daily traffic means. I will begin a review of this later tonight. –TC N7 JM 23:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead

located in the U.S. state of Washington flows better than located in Washington, United States.
- Fixed

Route description

In the second and third sentences, I'd change both uses of "in" to "at". I don't normally describe myself at being in an intersection, rather at one.
- Fixed
You know what? Maybe the other guy was right. Just using "19,000 vehicles" is a bit cryptic unless you somehow reword the sentence to mention AADT first.
- Fixed Sounder Bruce 03:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is going on hold for you to fix stuff. –TC N7 JM 03:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passing the article. Nice job! –TC N7 JM 04:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic