| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Watendlath article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
changes
editI have tried to turn this Stub into a article, any help would be welcome. John joskins 19:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
if anyone can add a picture i would be grateful John joskins 19:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
The depth of the tarn is surely incorrect. The figure shown is far greater than Wast Water! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.38.54 (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
sorry you are correct the right readings are altitude 863 ft, tarn depth 56 ft. John joskins (talk) 20:42, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Packhorse bridge
editThis section is misleading. There is a packhorse bridge in Watendlath but it isn't Ashness Bridge - that's the bridge about 3km to the north on the road leading to Watendlath. Ashness Bridge is certainly one of the most photographed bridges in Britain so the quotation from Hinchliffe's book might refer to that, rather than to the Watendlath packhorse bridge, however Ashness bridge is a road bridge, not a packhorse bridge (although it may have originally been a packhorse bridge that was widened for vehicles). Northern rock (talk) 15:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)