| This page was proposed for deletion by SwisterTwister (talk · contribs) on 26 September 2016 with the comment: PR information from PR sources for a company that involves itself with PR, the listed news sources are itself PR in that it contains not only the company's plans for itself and interviewed information by the company itself, the 2014 Oregonian article goes to the overly advertorial specifics about their new headquarters, something that only the company would mention, and they would mention it to interest clients and investors about a "shiny new headquarters"; all other newspaper articles are PR in that they have interviewed information by the businesspeople where they talk about the company, granted, something they would want to especially to entice the locals to buy and become clients; when there's such an overly used number of local news sources and, that news themselves consist of such PR subjects such as their new headquarters, it suggests there's nothing else actually substantial to talk about. My own searches have found other local news articles, but they all noticeable consist of interviewed information, other glorified information about the new headquarters, and then information about their clients and partners, that's a classic example of company-supplied information if all a news source has to publish is what the company says about itself! I'll note the article itself contains explosively noticeable amounts of clear PR SPA contributions and they are so consistent, it shows the company quite knows about this page and takes advantage of it. It was contested by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) on 2016-09-27 with the comment: there are significant incoming links, e.g. from Personalized marketing and Legislation.gov.uk. The first has a citation for "Webtrends, which is widely considered the first commercial web analytics solution". |