Talk:Wedding of Prince Philippe and Mathilde d'Udekem d'Acoz

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 22 January 2018

Requested move 22 January 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 20:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


– Per articles such as Wedding of Prince George, Duke of York, and Princess Mary of Teck and Wedding of Prince Albert, Duke of York, and Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, which include the ducal titles of the royal who married. 147.126.81.6 (talk) 20:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose - too long & not necessary to adhere to British formats for non-British people; Swedish royalty is normally not listed with ducal titles in these contexts. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment – agree with SergeWoodzing. British title styles should not be formatted for non-British royalty, if the norm is that Swedish royalty are not listed by ducal titles. CookieMonster755 16:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
    • Comment Most Swedish royals do have their ducal titles listed in their article name, though I'm not sure about when they're mentioned in other article titles.
Yes, in their own article's name - but mentioning the title in the wedding article's name only makes that article name excessively long. Anyone knowing Swedish could see how Bröllopet mellan Prinsessan Madeleine, hertiginna av Hälsingland och Gästrikland, och Christopher O'Neill looks like it would go against WP policy on conciseness. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.