Talk:West Champaran district
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the West Champaran district article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Bihar may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editA request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
West champaran instead of west champaran district
editThe title should be West champaran instead of west champaran district ?? --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 18:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Indigo
editWe need a citation to support that "Indigo cultivation yielded quick benefits to the British colonizers but frequent cultivation of indigo even for few years ruined the entire subsoil decreasing the possibility of any further cultivation of any kind. Even now, the regions of Indigo cultivation in the past are barren and have only scrub vegetation in stark contrast." RJFJR (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
May 2015
editWhile reading through the unsourced part of the "History" section, I found that most of it was copy-pasted from this source: [1]. The source does not make any copyright claims. Consequently, I have tagged it with {{close paraphrasing}}. Please feel free to remove that tag if you feel you that you have done the needful. The creator of the section has been informed at User_talk:Chandan_Guha#May_2015. ← scribbleink ᗧHᗣT 08:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hello and thanks Scribbleink for the tag. Just to clarify: a work is copyrighted as soon as it is committed to "paper" (virtual or otherwise), so we require a positive action be taken to release or license that text before we can use it. The section in question is indeed pulled from there: [2], so in the absence of a license release, we must actually do just the opposite and assume it is copyrighted, and therefor must be removed.
- From the history, Chandan Guha simply moved this section from the main article Bettiah in 2012, so no wrongdoing on his part. That content was originally added in 2008 where it was removed and re-added several times over the years. CrowCaw 22:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Crow: Thanks for taking care of that. Also, for the explanation so that I know how to handle these types of cases in the future. ← scribbleink ᗧHᗣT 21:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on West Champaran district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823163836/http://oldwww.wii.gov.in/envis/envis_pa_network/index.htm to http://oldwww.wii.gov.in/envis/envis_pa_network/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)