Talk:Western Satraps

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 09:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

File:Nahapana.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nahapana.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Revert

I have made a revert to this version, before edits by Per Honor et Gloria : its chronology was dubious and clashed with almost every other articles. (sorry for my poor english) Chaoborus (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted my own revert. Nothing is clear in these matters. --Chaoborus (talk) 16:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Western Satraps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051224062028/http://www.grifterrec.com:80/coins/india/ancientindia3.html to http://www.grifterrec.com/coins/india/ancientindia3.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061209050033/http://www.maharashtra.gov.in:80/english/gazetteer/nasik/005%20History/001%20AncientPeriod.htm to http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/gazetteer/nasik/005%20History/001%20AncientPeriod.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Helpful sources

@पाटलिपुत्र:. Hello, Pataliputra. Thank you for your recent expansion of article. I have some interest in the history of Gujarat so looking forward to your interesting work. I am pointing to some references. Please assess its quality and age and use as deem fit. Please look at two thesis: The Saka Kshatrapas of Western India (1966) Here and The Archeology of the settlements of Kshatrapa period (1997) [ http://hdl.handle.net/10603/168660 Here]. Thank you again. Happy editing.--Nizil (talk) 21:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the links Nizil. I am not sure that these can be used as reputable sources, as they seem to be University research work. As far as I know, they would need to be published by reputable publishers in order to become acceptable as reference for Wikipedia. Cheers पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 04:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

@पाटलिपुत्र:. I think research thesis are useful in many ways. Most of them are well referenced with older sources (which can be used here) for general review of topic with addition of some new research. We can ignore new research but add info from older sources with their direct citations. Do as you feel OK. Have a look at JSTOR paper for interesting discussion on Damajadasri/Damazada and some other new vital info. If you have access issues, I can email you PDF. (Your email settings are OFF on wikipedia).--Nizil (talk) 05:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Western Satraps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223182107/http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm to http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223182107/http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm to http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223182107/http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm to http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Note

Someone posted it in the article which I am moving here:In foot note number 13 on Rupiamma, I would like to point out that he wasn't from the Kshahartha family or the Kardamaka family of Chashtana. Some rulers used the title Mahakshtrapa without belonging to these dynasties. There is an article in Journal of Epigraphic Society of India Vol 18 by H.S. Thosar that will tell us the history of this Rupiamma. The pillar inscriptions merely mentions his name Mahakshtrapa Rupiamma with a low relief sculpture. There is no date or any other record. Rupiamma should not be included in the Western Satrap history.

Have a look.-Nizil (talk) 13:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

@पाटलिपुत्र:, I don't know about it but someone had posted it. Nizil (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't know what this is either.... पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 16:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Box titled: Gupta Empire coins on the model of the Western Satraps

The box contains a significant error: the fourth coin, purportedly of Budhagupta, is in fact of Skandagupta. The legend is actually the same as that on the third coin: vijitavaniravanipati jayati divam skandaguptoyam. The image should be replaced or removed. Rani nurmai (talk) 20:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Rani nurmai: Seems to be the case indeed... Correcting. Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 07:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)