Talk:Whitney Avenue

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Streets Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of streets in the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. StreetsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. StreetsU.S. city street articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

comments

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I started this article as a stub to replace a new redirect. It's a different topic than the target of the redirect, and the redirect article would not be well served to develop the topic of Whitney Avenue, per se. I would support the deletion of this article and redirect. However it takes months of time, and walls of text, to get a redirect deleted. --doncram (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Actually it seems the roadway itself, as a historic turnpike, may be adequately notable on its own, so i won't proceed with trying to get the redirect deleted; it should be an article i suppose. --doncram (talk) 16:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not a USRD article

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not doubting this street's notability, but this article doesn't fall under WP:USRD. Parts of it do and they should be, or hopefully already are, covered on the respective route pages. I have tagged it WP:USST instead. --Fredddie ™ 22:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

While not yet discussed in the article, this used to be CT Route 10A. --Polaron | Talk 23:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic