Talk:William Attaway/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Maclean25 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good article review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article? for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): 
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- One images used File:William Attaway.jpg claiming fair use. Do you know who the copyright holder is?
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Comments:
- I understand this is part of a class project: User:Profhanley/teaching/literature of labor.
- Replace the [clarification needed] tag with more detail [1]
- Address the {{refimprove}} tag at the top of the page by ensuring all sections have citations indicating where the information is coming from.
- You can properly (and consistently) format the references using the cite templates, like {{cite journal}}{{cite book}} {{cite web}}.
- Find a more scholarly reference than enotes.com. Where did resources did the enotes editor use to write that article?
- Pass/Fail:
- Conclusion
I will continue the review if there is work done to address these above notes. If there is no response, I will fail the article. maclean (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- It has been 2 weeks with little done to address the identified issue. I am closing this review now. Due to the above issues the article currently does not meet the GA criteria. maclean (talk) 03:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)