Talk:William Shakespear (explorer)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of William Shakespear (explorer) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
William Shakespear (explorer) → William Shakespear – This redirects to the disambiguation page at present. TBH I initally thought it would redirect to William Shakespeare, but this is the only article spelt William Shakespear, not William Shakespeare. Is anyone likely to mis-spell the poet's name? Unreal7 (talk) 10:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. "Shakespear" is a historical alternative spelling of the poet's name (see Spelling of William Shakespeare's name), and that meaning is probably far more common than this fairly obscure explorer. Ucucha (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ucucha. People are likely to "mis-spell" the poet's name. The undisambigged title should redirect to the Bard. Konjakupoet (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Strong oppose the playwright is also spelled this way, it's not a misspelling. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 23:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - per all above. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - I always look at titles from the viewpoint of the people Wikipedia was initially aimed at, namely the uninformed reader. So in answer to the question, yes uninformed readers could quite easily be confused between this spelling and the one with an "-e" at the end. Green Giant (talk) 17:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.