Talk:William Wesley

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Pro shoe?

edit

Rolando 21:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC) : This information on ProShoe is interesting but what is the source? Please contact me by clicking on my name at left and then clicking "email this user" on my user page. Thanks.Reply

References

edit

I took a first crack at adding notes and references. I have not seen the GQ article on Wesley and D. Wagner.

Category: Mysterious people

edit

I added this article to the category "Mysterious people." The rules for inclusion in that category are pretty hazy, but Wesley seems mysterious enough to me! Rolando 16:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

a mysterious figure

edit

putting William Wesley is a mysterious figure in the first sentence/paragraph just doesn't make sense. This is an enclopedia, the first paragraph should be clear on what he does that made him significant enough to have a page on wikipedia. I've never heard of this person before. And after reading the entire article, i still don't know know what he does? The only fact i read was that he knows some big name players. How does that make him mysterious? Z3u2 17:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're right. There nothing in the article that makers this man "mysterious." He sounds like he knows a lot of people and that's about it. There's certainly value in knowing people, especially certain people, but there's nothing "mysterious" about the fact. That he knows folks is right there for all to admire.
But the question is how he knows people. Nobody has been able to find out how he came to be the most connected man in American basketball, or how he made enough money that he's not seen working. He was completely off the radar and then all of a sudden he's in the corner of every picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.98.36 (talk) 03:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
This is no exaggeration. Wesley even participated in the Pacers-Pistons brawl!!! Ylee (talk) 05:45, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

An important edit

edit

In the paragraph entitled "controversy" the author states that an NCAA investigation on Wesley's influence on Josh Selby's de-commitment from The University of Tennessee. The author cites an article from ESPN.com as a reference for this assertion. The article referenced mentions nothing of a pending NCAA violation. This apears to be an inaccurate or unverifiable claim.

An important edit

edit

In the paragraph entitled "controversy" the author states that a NCAA investigation on Wesley's influence in Josh Selby's de-commitment from The University of Tennessee. The author cites an article from ESPN.com as a reference for this assertion. The article referenced mentions nothing of a pending NCAA violation. This appears to be an inaccurate or unverifiable claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.210.60.108 (talk) 02:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Wesley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Corrected formatting/usage for //www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/11820030.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply