Talk:Women in the war in Donbas
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Nederlandse Leeuw in topic "Female servicemen"
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 23 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Women in the war in Donbas to Women in the war in Donbas (2014–2022). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Combatants of the war in Donbas which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
"Female servicemen"
editAlthough this is true, it appears only on one single page of the White Book 2019-2020 (p. 97). The whole document uses the terms
- "servicemen" 118 times, including that 1 time "female servicemen" (p. 97)
- "service personnel" (or "service-personnel") 60 times, including
- in the chapter 6 title
Humanitarian Policy and Social Guarantees for Service Personnel in the Armed Forces
), - "female service-personnel" 6 times (all on p. 95),
- "women service-personnel" 2 times (both on p. 97, the same page as that 1 time "female servicemen")
- in the chapter 6 title
- "servicewomen" 0 times
Do we really need to focus on that 1 translation error in our main body text? In all other occassions it's perfectly fine, and we see that they adopt gender-neutral language in many places where it is clear that it is about women, or can include women. I'm removing this, and making this a proper reference. NLeeuw (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)