Talk:Worldcom PR Group
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editCOI Disclaimer: I'm with a member firm of Worldcom PR Group. The member list on the page is out of date, does not provide appropriate links and is randomly arranged. I'd like to sort the firms by region and then alphabetically within region and provide external and/or internal links (if individual agencies have wikipedia pages). The full member list is on the worldcom site (http://worldcomgroup.com) and the update would merely reflect the changes in membership since they were last updated.
Edit Request: Worldcom PR Group partners
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. |
Organize and Update the partner list to current information, as noted at the Worldcom website (http://worldcomgroup.com). Provided below is a sample of the edits to be made, but cover only the U.S. section. The remaining geographical areas would be completed in the same manner. My COI has been noted previously, but as a matter of full disclosure, I am employed by one of the member firm of the Worldcom group.
Prcog (talk) 14:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- A better solution is to remove the long list of partners, which I have done. This level of detail is appropriate for the group website, but not for an encyclopedia article, quite apart from the likelihood that it will go out of date. Anyone who wants to know has the group's own website only a click away.
- Can you supply updates for the many deadlinks in the article? JohnCD (talk) 11:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing. Also, many of the member companies are obvious AfD candidates. However, I would support something like Category:Worldcom Companies if enough of the member companies warrant/have an article. CorporateM (Talk) 21:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks all. Removal of the list does seem to fit all our needs. JohnCD - I will inquire about new press/media mentions that are still live and update as appropriate (with notice here first, of course). CorporateM - Thank you for the recommendation. Unfortunately I do not believe enough companies have/would warrant an article thereby making the Category article very unrepresentative of the group as a whole. Thank you both again.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Worldcom PR Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080906182308/http://www.marketingservicestalk.com/news/kes/kes100.html to http://www.marketingservicestalk.com/news/kes/kes100.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)