Talk:Xifeng concentration camp
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Juxlos in topic Did you know nomination
Xifeng concentration camp is currently a World history good article nominee. Nominated by — Chris Woodrich (talk) at 20:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xifeng concentration camp article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
- ... that the barracks at the Xifeng concentration camp were named for Confucian tenets such as righteousness and filial piety?
- Source: Mühlhahn, Klaus (2009). Criminal Justice in China: A History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-674-05433-2.
- ALT1: ... that the Kuomintang drew from both Nazi and Soviet examples when establishing the Xifeng concentration camp? Source: Mühlhahn, Klaus (2009). Criminal Justice in China: A History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-674-05433-2.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Brenden Bates
- Comment: There could be a hook in Song Zhenzhong being an infant when detained at Xifeng and nine when executed, but I need a stout drink.
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 689 past nominations.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC).
- Article new and long enough, well-referenced throughout. Both hooks confirmed in the Muhlhahn book, and both interesting, either will work. QPQ is done, and copyvio not detected (Earwig only flagged long names). Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 07:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Notes
edit- This appears to have been the official website of the attraction. It's dead of this timestamp. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)