![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
editXIN → Xin (comics) … Rationale: to be brought in line with Xin (disambiguation), to which the current name will redirect
Survey
edit- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- I support shit:P
- Support, should someone who has the ability to do so just move this now? AfroDwarf 17:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Add any additional comments
- If the rename happens, then Xin (disambiguation) should be moved to XIN the redirect should not be used. Vegaswikian 05:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
No...There still need to be a dist- page
because using XIN as a capital letter, is wrong it is just using it with the logo
CLEANING UP
editTo any one making a clean up to this article. Please state here the changes you are making, we don't want any details going wrong:/ (this is pointing at you RandyWang!)
- Xino, whatever happened to reading the edit summary? The changes I made were really pretty self-explanatory, and you could have seen the exact changes I made by simply comparing edits. RandyWang 21:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Yea, but the edit summary doesn't give you enough entries. It as a limit. So it is better here to do it.
All you have to do is, state why you have deleted this note/details. Simple! So it won't have to be reverted. If you fill that edit is a vandal, no need to state it here.
Xino, what is ambiguous about this? Fixed style, dodgy language. Removed unencyclopedic and duplicated sentence. Retitled the "Publication History" section: this is the story, NOT the history of the comicbook. {dablink} + {context}. As far as I can tell, I stated exactly what I had done to the article, which you could easily have checked for yourself by comparing it with the preceding version. If all your reverts are made based on the edit summaries, I'd contend that you're too willing to revert entire posts. RandyWang 09:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Xin/XIN
editI was searching for an article based on the comice book I read, I searched Xin. I found nothing on it, so I searched XIN. I found this, I added some info to it, others did.
This article, isn't typically about the character Xin: Monkey. This article featuresOther characters that appears in this comic, and season comics
To make the article right:
*Character Sections
- Xin: Monkey Section (is own section)
*Season/Issue Section which we have done
- More screenshot of some issues
I found that this article as been mixed up with the character and made lots of changes.
- I have added a character section. I managed to add all the names but without any details. Here is a website if you are willing to help with that section[1]
- The Comic and Issue sections are gone, merged with Story section. I deleted all details in the section, because I added a copy righted details.
- Since RandyWang deleted the Weapons and Ability section, under the Character sections, will have each characters ability.
- For the infobox, it needs to be replaced. This is a comic article not about a comic character!
I have some problems with these additions:
- What purpose does the Characters section serve? By itself, it's totally useless - if you're going to add it, at least provide some context, and a brief summary of each character's story and background. Their names, by themselves, are totally useless.
- What "useful information" did I delete? Edit the page how you like, but don't blame me for things that you don't even attempt to fix.
RandyWang 21:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
What purpose does the Characters section serve? By itself, it's totally useless - if you're going to add it, at least provide some context, and a brief summary of each character's story and background. Their names, by themselves, are totally useless.
Yes...that is the exact point! But I couldn't be botherd to add it now! Because I didn't have time to add them before.
What "useful information" did I delete? Edit the page how you like, but don't blame me for things that you don't even attempt to fix.
Trust me...before, all I do in article is, adding vaulable informations. Sometimes fill article that are stubs with data! Others will see mistakes and bad grammar, which I knew they will fix. Wikipedia, anybody can edit. All I have to do is...add info...others will correct mistakes. But you in the other hand. you won't know what the article is about, and go on fixing mistakes but adding info the other way round.
But now, I have a target and aim. (in talk page). And as for the info you deleted...don't worry about it, I said before it will go under the character section.:P
This article can be stub...I don't really care. I am working on other article right now:P