Talk:Yellow (Brymo album)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yellow (Brymo album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Versace1608 (talk · contribs) 14:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vanderwaalforces (talk · contribs) 07:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

• Will review this shortly. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Lead

• Okay per WP:LEADLENGTH. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Background and promotion

Composition

• Looks good and concise. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:50, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Critical reception

• Looks good, quoted statements correctly sourced and that's fine. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Track listing

• All tracks are written by Ọlawale Ọlọfọrọ, except for "Abụ Ya" → All tracks are written by Ọlawale Ọlọfọrọ and produced by Mikky Me Joses, except for "Abụ Ya" which was written by Lindsey Abudei? and co-produced by Nsikak David and Lindsey Abudei. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

  I  Fixed this, BTW. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Personnel

• Okay. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Release history

• Okay. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

References

• Sources checked out, all good. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
• @Versace1608: Kindly replace BellaNaija links with a more reliable source. Otherwise, the statements would have to be removed entirely. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

  Hi Vanderwaalforces, I really appreciate you taking your time to review the article. Thank you so much for that. I don't think BellaNaija is a questionable source. I know they're a blog but I do believe they have some editorial oversight, although I can't say for sure what that is or what it looks like. I have never heard of BellaNaija posting fake stories or heard famous ppl in Nigeria asking them to retract an article they posted. I know that Linda Ikeji's blog is known for having these problems but I can't say for sure if BellaNaija has these problems. Anyways, I'll look at the info in question and see if I can replace it with another source.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 06:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

• The Apple Music album link does not work, there must have been an update to it, can you check and update that? --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

  The archived link does work, so that's acceptable. The album was removed from streaming services and reinstated a few weeks later. This is why the link in the article doesn't work; however, readers can always clicked the archived link to see it.

  Regarding BellaNaija, it is a reliable source. There is no consensus out there that it isn't. Their about page states that they are started out as a blog but is no longer a blog. They are a full fledge website and like I said earlier, I have not come across any info that questions their reliability.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 14:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

  @Versace1608 I have no serious doubt about BellaNaija's reliability as well, I, for one, don't consider them utterly unreliable on this same sense as you. Perhaps I'll need to update WP:NGRS. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

  @Versace1608 When I looked at the diffs that claimed they are unreliable, one was from 2018 by Ammarpad, and who claimed it's a gossip blog, of course back in 2018 (Special:Permalink/863806725), I wouldn't call that consensus. But I would call this one from 2021 consensus even though it was only two comments. For this 2021 consensus to be reassessed, a new RfC would have to be raised (I am literally planning on doing that for quite a handle of other online publications I respect). This is the reason, as of this review, BellaNaija cannot be considered reliable, even though it now is. This is in the name of not violating consensus policy. But the AfroCine project currently consider this publication reliable based on Special:Permalink/1170096459. I am confident in passing this review based on this.

  Every other source checks out good. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Final comments

• This article is well-written and structured, all track listings are correctly formatted. The length is also good, there's no copyright violation, there's no issues with the referencing formats. The sources cited are okay and finally this article passes all the good article criteria as shown in the checklist below. Congratulations again on this work you've done, Versace1608.--Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.