This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yellow stingray article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Yellow stingray has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Yellow stingray/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC) Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. Comments in a day or 2. Sasata (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Excellent work as usual. Just a few comments:
- wlink/wikt link for reticulations in the lead
- Done
- should Urolophus jamaicensis be put as a synonym in the taxobox?
- My own policy is to only include original combinations in the synonyms box
- "…and inserts a single claspers into her cloaca." clasper or claspers?
- Fixed
- any lifespan info?
- Added
- anything worthwhile to add from the following?
- Title: A Unique Vascular Configuration among the Efferent Branchial Arteries and Splanchnic Arteries in the Yellow Stingray, Urobatis jamaicensis
- Author(s): Basten, BL; Sherman, RL; Lametschwandtner, A, et al.
- Source: MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS Volume: 15 Issue: 3 Pages: 194-196 Published: 2009
- Title: Evoked potential audiograms of the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) and the yellow stingray (Urobatis jamaicensis)
- Author(s): Casper, BM; Mann, DA
- Source: ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES Volume: 76 Issue: 1 Pages: 101-108 Published: MAY 2006
- Title: Gross brain morphology in the yellow stingray, Urobatis jamaicensis
- Author(s): Walker, Brian K.; Sherman, Robin L.
- Source: Florida Scientist Volume: 64 Issue: 4 Pages: 246-249 Published: Autumn, 2001
- I added brief notes about the hearing threshold and the brain size; the circulatory system info is probably too esoteric for the general reader (and for me).
Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- All GA criteria are met or exceeded. Sasata (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Well written, complies with MoS.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
- All good.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are PD or appropriately licensed.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: