Talk:Yellow stingray/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC) Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. Comments in a day or 2. Sasata (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Excellent work as usual. Just a few comments:

• wlink/wikt link for reticulations in the lead

• Done

• should Urolophus jamaicensis be put as a synonym in the taxobox?

• My own policy is to only include original combinations in the synonyms box

• "…and inserts a single claspers into her cloaca." clasper or claspers?

• Fixed

• any lifespan info?

• Added

• anything worthwhile to add from the following?

Title: A Unique Vascular Configuration among the Efferent Branchial Arteries and Splanchnic Arteries in the Yellow Stingray, Urobatis jamaicensis

Author(s): Basten, BL; Sherman, RL; Lametschwandtner, A, et al.

Source: MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS Volume: 15 Issue: 3 Pages: 194-196 Published: 2009

Title: Evoked potential audiograms of the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) and the yellow stingray (Urobatis jamaicensis)

Author(s): Casper, BM; Mann, DA

Source: ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES Volume: 76 Issue: 1 Pages: 101-108 Published: MAY 2006

Title: Gross brain morphology in the yellow stingray, Urobatis jamaicensis

Author(s): Walker, Brian K.; Sherman, Robin L.

Source: Florida Scientist Volume: 64 Issue: 4 Pages: 246-249 Published: Autumn, 2001

• I added brief notes about the hearing threshold and the brain size; the circulatory system info is probably too esoteric for the general reader (and for me).

Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

All GA criteria are met or exceeded. Sasata (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Well written, complies with MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):

   All good.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are PD or appropriately licensed.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: